[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1319616310.18883.16.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:05:10 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: use IS_ENABLED() macro to cleanup code
Le mercredi 26 octobre 2011 à 10:00 +0200, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 08:34 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mardi 25 octobre 2011 à 19:30 -0400, David Miller a écrit :
> >
> > > net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c: In function ‘do_ip_setsockopt’:
> > > net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:523:29: error: ‘LOOPBACK4_IPV6’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:523:29: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > >
> > > This fails because ip_sockglue.c guards the net/transp_v6.h header
> > > inclusion with a real CPP guard.
> >
> > Yep, it seems compiler was not able to perform optimisation of dead
> > code.
> [...]
>
> No, the compiler is just checking the code further than you wanted
> before optimising it away.
>
Well, I was not saying compiler was guilty here.
Dead code must be parsed and compiled too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists