netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: use IS_ENABLED() macro to cleanup code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111026.155620.2146384686184694859.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:56:20 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: use IS_ENABLED() macro to cleanup code

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:34:34 +0200

> Le mardi 25 octobre 2011 à 19:30 -0400, David Miller a écrit :
> 
>> net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c: In function ‘do_ip_setsockopt’:
>> net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:523:29: error: ‘LOOPBACK4_IPV6’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:523:29: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> 
>> This fails because ip_sockglue.c guards the net/transp_v6.h header
>> inclusion with a real CPP guard.
> 
> Yep, it seems compiler was not able to perform optimisation of dead
> code.

It's not the issue of optimizing the code out, in the end the compiler
will optimize this stuff out.

Rather, the issue is that the code seen by the compiler must be parsable.