[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1319717597.2601.28.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:13:17 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@...acom.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add TCP_NO_DELAYED_ACK socket option
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2011 à 14:54 +0300, Daniel Baluta a écrit :
> Few days ago, in our custom kernel we made TCP Delack segments and
> TCP Delack timeout parameters tunable via proc entries.
> Increasing tcp_delack_segs (number of full sized segments that must
> be received until an ACK is sent) we observed an improvement of
> throughput up to 20% in some test cases.
>
> Do you think that this kind of patch would have a chance to be
> included in mainstream?
>
If your patches are ready, why not sending them as RFC ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists