netdev - Re: [PATCH] Add TCP_NO_DELAYED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEnQRZAbpXZh9GA_XXwXhymKxwB7tO4+m5E8ZDAz+mN4cPEMhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:18:35 +0300
From:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add TCP_NO_DELAYED_ACK socket option

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le jeudi 27 octobre 2011 à 14:54 +0300, Daniel Baluta a écrit :
>
>> Few days ago, in our custom kernel we made TCP Delack segments and
>> TCP Delack timeout parameters tunable via proc entries.
>> Increasing tcp_delack_segs (number of full sized segments that must
>> be received until an ACK is sent) we observed an improvement of
>> throughput up to 20% in some test cases.
>>
>> Do you think that this kind of patch would have a chance to be
>> included in mainstream?
>>
>
> If your patches are ready, why not sending them as RFC ?

OK, I will port them to the latest kernel and send a patch.

thanks,
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html