netdev - [PATCH net v4 1/4] forcedeth: Acknowledge only interrupts that are being processed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5eeafda710f555e73c9eafdc8bd1ed6dc7f73a18.1320463771.git.david.decotigny@google.com>
Date:	Fri,  4 Nov 2011 21:04:39 -0700
From:	David Decotigny <david.decotigny@...gle.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Szymon Janc <szymon@...c.net.pl>,
	Mike Ditto <mditto@...gle.com>,
	David Decotigny <david.decotigny@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v4 1/4] forcedeth: Acknowledge only interrupts that are being processed

From: Mike Ditto <mditto@...gle.com>

This is to avoid a race, accidentally acknowledging an interrupt that
we didn't notice and won't immediately process.  This is based solely
on code inspection; it is not known if there was an actual bug here.



Signed-off-by: David Decotigny <david.decotigny@...gle.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
index 1e37eb9..056986b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
@@ -3398,7 +3398,8 @@ static irqreturn_t nv_nic_irq_tx(int foo, void *data)
 
 	for (i = 0;; i++) {
 		events = readl(base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus) & NVREG_IRQ_TX_ALL;
-		writel(NVREG_IRQ_TX_ALL, base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus);
+		writel(events, base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus);
+		netdev_dbg(dev, "tx irq events: %08x\n", events);
 		if (!(events & np->irqmask))
 			break;
 
@@ -3509,7 +3510,8 @@ static irqreturn_t nv_nic_irq_rx(int foo, void *data)
 
 	for (i = 0;; i++) {
 		events = readl(base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus) & NVREG_IRQ_RX_ALL;
-		writel(NVREG_IRQ_RX_ALL, base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus);
+		writel(events, base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus);
+		netdev_dbg(dev, "rx irq events: %08x\n", events);
 		if (!(events & np->irqmask))
 			break;
 
@@ -3553,7 +3555,8 @@ static irqreturn_t nv_nic_irq_other(int foo, void *data)
 
 	for (i = 0;; i++) {
 		events = readl(base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus) & NVREG_IRQ_OTHER;
-		writel(NVREG_IRQ_OTHER, base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus);
+		writel(events, base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus);
+		netdev_dbg(dev, "irq events: %08x\n", events);
 		if (!(events & np->irqmask))
 			break;
 
@@ -3617,10 +3620,10 @@ static irqreturn_t nv_nic_irq_test(int foo, void *data)
 
 	if (!(np->msi_flags & NV_MSI_X_ENABLED)) {
 		events = readl(base + NvRegIrqStatus) & NVREG_IRQSTAT_MASK;
-		writel(NVREG_IRQ_TIMER, base + NvRegIrqStatus);
+		writel(events & NVREG_IRQ_TIMER, base + NvRegIrqStatus);
 	} else {
 		events = readl(base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus) & NVREG_IRQSTAT_MASK;
-		writel(NVREG_IRQ_TIMER, base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus);
+		writel(events & NVREG_IRQ_TIMER, base + NvRegMSIXIrqStatus);
 	}
 	pci_push(base);
 	if (!(events & NVREG_IRQ_TIMER))
-- 
1.7.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html