[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1111070434220.26514@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 04:36:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
cc: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>, kaber@...sh.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hans@...illstrom.com
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] NETFILTER module xt_hmark new target for HASH
based fw
On Monday 2011-11-07 01:52, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> +static __u32 get_hash(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_hmark_info *info)
>> +{
>> + int nhoff, hash = 0, poff, proto, frag = 0;
>> + struct iphdr *ip;
>> + u8 ip_proto;
>> + u32 addr1, addr2, ihl;
>> + u16 snatport = 0, dnatport = 0;
>> + union {
>> + u32 v32;
>> + u16 v16[2];
>> + } ports;
>> +
>> + nhoff = skb_network_offset(skb);
>> + proto = skb->protocol;
>> +
>> + if (!proto && skb->sk) {
>> + if (skb->sk->sk_family == AF_INET)
>> + proto = __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP);
>> + else if (skb->sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
>> + proto = __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>
>You already have the layer3 protocol number in xt_action_param. No
>need to use the socket information then.
xt_action_param.family (NFPROTO_) is not the same class af AF_ or ETH_.
Though, wouldn't proto = skb->proto; just be simpler here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists