netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: vlan: 802.1ad S-VLAN support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111111.202235.1981500713669985784.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:22:35 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	equinox@...c24.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: vlan: 802.1ad S-VLAN support

From: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
Date: Sat,  5 Nov 2011 17:54:14 +0100

> @@ -87,7 +97,8 @@ struct vlan_group {
>  					    */
>  	unsigned int		nr_vlans;
>  	struct hlist_node	hlist;	/* linked list */
> -	struct net_device **vlan_devices_arrays[VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_SPLIT_PARTS];
> +	struct net_device **vlan_devices_arrays[VLAN_N_PROTOCOL]
> +						[VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_SPLIT_PARTS];
>  	struct rcu_head		rcu;
>  };

This is a terrible waste of memory.  You're now using 5 times as much space,
the vast majority of which will be entirely unused.

I don't even think it's semantically correct, all these alias QinQ protocol
values don't provide completely new VLAN_ID name spaces at all.  So this
layout doesn't even make any sense, you're allowing for something that isn't
even allowed.

Rework these datastructures to eliminate the wastage please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html