[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1321214895.3101.3.camel@lb-tlvb-eilong.il.broadcom.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:08:15 +0200
From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"pstaszewski@...are.pl" <pstaszewski@...are.pl>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: reduce skb truesize by 50%
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:42 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le dimanche 13 novembre 2011 à 20:53 +0200, Eilon Greenstein a écrit :
>
> > I’m not sure I’m following the math over here. Assuming L1 is 64 bytes,
> > we need up to 63 bytes to align the start address (assuming SLOB is
> > being used) and additional (up to) 63 bytes at the end. That can sum up
> > to 126 bytes am I missing something?
> >
>
> What do you really mean by aligning the end ?
I mean padding it to full cache line.
> How can both start and end of a frame can be aligned ?
The packet will start at aligned address and (using padding) will end at
cache line boundaries.
> If hardware needs extra room after the end of frame, then we already
> have it (since we store struct skb_shared_info here)
We have some space in there, but as far as I can tell it's not up to 63
bytes, right? We will overrun the dataref.
Thanks,
Eilon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists