[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111113201336.GA1362@elgon.mountain>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:13:36 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [patch 0/8 2.6.32] CVE-2010-4251: packet backlog can get too large
I'm still very new to this whole -stable business so please let me
know if I do somethig wrong.
This patch series is to address CVE-2010-4251 for the 2.6.32 stable
kernel. Here is the CVE summary:
"The socket implementation in net/core/sock.c in the Linux kernel
before 2.6.34 does not properly manage a backlog of received
packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service
(memory consumption) by sending a large amount of network traffic,
as demonstrated by netperf UDP tests."
[patch 1/8] introduces sk_add_backlog_limited()
[patch 2-7/8] change each network protocol to use sk_add_backlog_limited()
where appropriate.
[patch 8/8] renames sk_add_backlog() to __sk_add_backlog() and
sk_add_backlog_limited() to sk_add_backlog().
The patches mostly apply without changes. The exception is:
[patch 2/8] udp: use limited socket backlog
Then the rename [patch 8/8] needed to be changed as well to match.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists