netdev - Re: [PATCH] bonding: Don't allow mode change via sysfs with slaves present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111117.193229.204248404169838998.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:32:29 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com
Cc:	vfalico@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, andy@...yhouse.net,
	fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: Don't allow mode change via sysfs with slaves
 present

From: Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:36:57 +0100

> Le 17/11/2011 22:04, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Veaceslav Falico<vfalico@...hat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:44:42 +0100
>>
>>> When changing mode via bonding's sysfs, the slaves are not initialized
>>> correctly. Forbid to change modes with slaves present to ensure that
>>> every
>>> slave is initialized correctly via bond_enslave().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico<vfalico@...hat.com>
>>
>> Lots of discussion... what is the final verdict on this patch bonding
>> folks?
> 
> Now looks good to me, and as all others participants agreed at the
> beginning, I think it's good for everyone.

Great, applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html