[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201111210213.pAL2DRxt013405@jmr105.jmicron.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:13:27 +0800
From: "Aries Lee" <arieslee@...cron.com>
To: "'Guo-Fu Tseng'" <cooldavid@...ldavid.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "'AriesLee'" <AriesLeeILan@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] PHY configuration for compatible issue
Yes ~~ that's indeed a good suggestion
-----Original Message-----
From: Guo-Fu Tseng [mailto:cooldavid@...ldavid.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 12:20 PM
To: Aries Lee; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: 'AriesLee'
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] PHY configuration for compatible issue
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:13:37 +0800, Aries Lee wrote
> Hi Guo-Fu and All
>
> Because jme_phy_on() and jme_phy_off() just turn on/off the PHY, the
> value of extern register is still the power on default value, not the most
> robust value which we collect in the LAB.
Sure, I got it. That's the point of this patch isn't it? :p
+ /* Turn PHY off */
+ bmcr = jme_mdio_read(jme->dev, jme->mii_if.phy_id, MII_BMCR);
+ bmcr |= BMCR_PDOWN;
+ jme_mdio_write(jme->dev, jme->mii_if.phy_id, MII_BMCR, bmcr);
+ /* Turn PHY on */
+ bmcr = jme_mdio_read(jme->dev, jme->mii_if.phy_id, MII_BMCR);
+ bmcr &= ~BMCR_PDOWN;
+ jme_mdio_write(jme->dev, jme->mii_if.phy_id, MII_BMCR, bmcr);
But what I mean is this part of the code.
Guo-Fu Tseng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists