[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJK669ZhM_KSOd0MS7jTVvJ16KqNzPCj-Ns1ytN5NPg5PxgoOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:33:50 +0100
From: Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>
To: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Orishko <alexey.orishko@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] if_ether.h: Add IEEE 802.1 Local Experimental Ethertype 1.
Hi Rémi,
> It's even weirder then. If you have control over both ends and the NCM 1.0
> interface is not adequate, then you really should use your own CDC class
> for the purpose.
The reason we use NCM is performance: CDC normally gives less than 100Mbps,
while NCM can give you up to 200Mbps.
Regards,
Sjur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists