[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201112051746.18180.remi@remlab.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:46:14 +0200
From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi@...lab.net>
To: Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Orishko <alexey.orishko@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] if_ether.h: Add IEEE 802.1 Local Experimental Ethertype 1.
Le lundi 5 décembre 2011 16:33:50 Sjur Brændeland, vous avez écrit :
> Hi Rémi,
>
> > It's even weirder then. If you have control over both ends and the NCM
> > 1.0 interface is not adequate, then you really should use your own CDC
> > class for the purpose.
>
> The reason we use NCM is performance: CDC normally gives less than 100Mbps,
> while NCM can give you up to 200Mbps.
NCM is a sub-profile of CDC, so that statement makes no sense to me.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists