[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B626C0CF@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:53:11 +0000
From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
To: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
"Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] igb: reset PHY after recovering from PHY power
down
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Koki Sanagi [mailto:sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 7:18 PM
>To: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse;
>Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V;
>Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; e1000-
>devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
>Cc: davem@...emloft.net
>Subject: [PATCH net-next] igb: reset PHY after recovering from PHY power
>down
>
>According to 82576_Datasheet.pdf, PHY setting is lost after PHY power
>down.
>So resetting PHY is needed when recovering from PHY power down to set a
>default
>setting to PHY register.
>
>Owing to this lack, NIC doesn't link up in some rare situation.
>The situation I encountered is following.
>
>
>1.Both ports connect to switch.
>+---------+ +--------+
>| |-----------| |
>| 82576NS | | switch |
>| |-----------| |
>+---------+ +--------+
>
>2.Detach both cables from switch.
>+---------+ +--------+
>| |------- | |
>| 82576NS | | switch |
>| |------- | |
>+---------+ +--------+
>
>3.Detach one cable from one port.
>+---------+ +--------+
>| |------- | |
>| 82576NS | | switch |
>| | | |
>+---------+ +--------+
>
>4.Attach that cable to the other port.(It means connecting directly each
>port)
>+---------+ +--------+
>| |-------+ | |
>| 82576NS | | | switch |
>| |-------+ | |
>+---------+ +--------+
>
>As a result, NIC doesn't link up sometimes.
>
>Signed-off-by: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
>---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>index bd9b30e..4d4f065 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>@@ -2496,6 +2496,7 @@ static int igb_open(struct net_device *netdev)
> goto err_setup_rx;
>
> igb_power_up_link(adapter);
>+ igb_reset_phy(hw);
>
> /* before we allocate an interrupt, we must be ready to handle it.
> * Setting DEBUG_SHIRQ in the kernel makes it fire an interrupt
I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. After a review, I see that the needed change is simpler than I thought at first. Can you resubmit with the igb_reset_phy call being added to the end of the igb_power_up_link function instead of after it in igb_open. That way, whenever igb_power_link is called in the code, it will also execute the igb_reset_phy function which is the complete solution. Thank you for your work on the igb driver.
Carolyn
Carolyn Wyborny
Linux Development
LAN Access Division
Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists