[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1325182236.2607.50.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:10:36 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
"John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@...nsourcedevel.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netem: fix classful handling
Le jeudi 29 décembre 2011 à 18:43 +0100, Hagen Paul Pfeifer a écrit :
> * Eric Dumazet | 2011-12-29 18:15:50 [+0100]:
>
> >> In other words netem jitter and a qdisc !tfifo will not work. Correct? The
> >> rate extension also peak the last packet to get the reference time (assuming a
> >> strict ordering):
> >>
> >
> >Yep, current situation is borked. It assumes we _use_ tfifo, for delay
> >jitters but also for rate extension.
>
> Mhh, should we signal this to the user via 'tc -s qdisc show'? Or should we
> assume that a user who set netem rate|jitter AND a qdisc !tfifo knows what he
> does - because we assume he is a experienced user? At least somewhere in the
> manpage a comment should point to this characteristic.
I dont quite understand the question. The patch I posted is supposed to
fix the problem. What do you want to tell to the user ?
netem module is probably only used by experimented users, on very recent
kernels anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists