netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] netem: fix classful handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111229182502.GD2948@hell>
Date:	Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:25:03 +0100
From:	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
	"John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@...nsourcedevel.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netem: fix classful handling

* Eric Dumazet | 2011-12-29 19:10:36 [+0100]:

>I dont quite understand the question. The patch I posted is supposed to
>fix the problem. What do you want to tell to the user ?

I assumed that the patch makes it possible to replace standard tfifo?! Tfifo
provides strict ordering, other qdisc's do not. So I thought if someone use
netem rate|jitter with e.g. SFQ then this should be mentioned somewhere. E.g.
"rate|jitter can only be used with tfifo qdisc". Correct me if I am wrong.

Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html