[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F05ECDA.30506@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:32:58 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP communication for raw image transmission
On 01/05/2012 01:55 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 janvier 2012 à 10:48 +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois a écrit :
>
>> It does not seem to work :
>> netperf -H 192.168.0.1 -l 10 -t UDP_STREAM
>> MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
>> 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
>> Socket Message Elapsed Messages
>> Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
>> bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 106496 65507 10.01 1836 0 0.00
>> 419227124 0.00 536870912 0.00
>>
>
> Thats because netperf -t UDP_STREAM sends big UDP frames by default,
> that must be fragmented, and defragmented on destination. Maybe some
> frags are lost.
There is also the question of the bogus values on the second line.
There are some "fixed in top-of-trunk" issues in that area with respect
to the migrated UDP_STREAM results printing. The top of trunk also has
a netperf control message size change, which means you have to make sure
to update both sides to the top-of-trunk. (Netperf has never
"supported" mixing versions though doing so has often "worked.")
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists