netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: net: Fix dependency for EEPROM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1325783007.3764.19.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date:	Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:03:27 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
CC:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <gwingerde@...il.com>,
	<linville@...driver.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: net: Fix dependency for EEPROM_93CX6

On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 10:11 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 07:37 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Fix the following build warning:
> >
> > warning: (KS8851&&  AX88796_93CX6&&  RTL8180&&  RTL8187&&  ADM8211&&  RT2400PCI&&  RT2500PCI&&  RT61PCI&&  RT2800PCI&&  R8187SE) selects EEPROM_93CX6 which has unmet direct dependencies (MISC_DEVICES)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam<fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Place MISC_DEVICES dependency into the 'depends on' line
> 
> Is this the right way to fix this? Whenever I get this kind of build warning, I 
> usually attribute it to a problem with my local configuration and fix my copy of 
> .config, not modify the build system. With this change, it seems to me that a 
> lot of devices will suddenly disappear from the build with little explanation.

I entirely agree.

> I don't feel confident enough to NACK the patch, but I would like an expert to 
> comment.

I'm not an expert but am prepared to be opinionated!

> I have noticed that the defconfigs for various architectures are split between 
> turning MISC_DEVICES on or off.

That seems like a bug, since MISC_DEVICES doesn't by itself select any
code.  (It's also not a meaningful category and maybe ought not to be an
option at all.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html