[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120110175251.4b6ad831@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:52:51 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: netfilter: Fix dependency for
BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:48:25 -0200
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> Fix the following build warning:
>
> warning: (BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES) selects NETFILTER_XTABLES which has unmet direct dependencies (NET && INET && NETFILTER)
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig b/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig
> index a9aff9c..9ca621a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>
> menuconfig BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES
> tristate "Ethernet Bridge tables (ebtables) support"
> - depends on BRIDGE && NETFILTER
> + depends on BRIDGE && NETFILTER && INET
> select NETFILTER_XTABLES
> help
> ebtables is a general, extensible frame/packet identification
Almost everybody has INET defined... but still it should be possible to run ebtables
without INET layer. Looks like a but in XTABLES to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists