[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120110.223205.265079469678742211.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:32:05 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: festevam@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, fabio.estevam@...escale.com,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: netfilter: Fix dependency for
BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:52:51 -0800
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:48:25 -0200
> Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Fix the following build warning:
>>
>> warning: (BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES) selects NETFILTER_XTABLES which has unmet direct dependencies (NET && INET && NETFILTER)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
>> ---
>> net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig b/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig
>> index a9aff9c..9ca621a 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig
>> +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>
>> menuconfig BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES
>> tristate "Ethernet Bridge tables (ebtables) support"
>> - depends on BRIDGE && NETFILTER
>> + depends on BRIDGE && NETFILTER && INET
>> select NETFILTER_XTABLES
>> help
>> ebtables is a general, extensible frame/packet identification
>
> Almost everybody has INET defined... but still it should be possible to run ebtables
> without INET layer. Looks like a but in XTABLES to me.
And this needs to be CC:'d to the netfilter folks meanwhile, added...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists