[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyAX_OdE7yNp1vM1AmywrYZ9Pvr0EX47jNQciZKOQUQHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:06:15 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Subject: Re: brcm80211 breakage..
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> wrote:
> --- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
> +++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ int bcma_sprom_get(struct bcma_bus *bus)
> * TODO: understand this condition and use it */
> offset = (bus->chipinfo.id == 0x4331) ? BCMA_CC_SPROM :
> BCMA_CC_SPROM_PCIE6;
> + pr_debug("SPROM offset 0x%x\n", offset);
> bcma_sprom_read(bus, offset, sprom);
>
> if (bus->chipinfo.id == 0x4331)
So I did that - the offset is printed out as 0x0830
(BCMA_CC_SPROM_PCIE6). And when I change the offset to 0x0800
(BCMA_CC_SPROM), the complaint about SPROM version goes away.
IOW, these messages no longer exist:
[ 0.815750] bcma: Unsupported SPROM revision: 255
[ 0.815804] bcma: No SPROM available
but that doesn't actually make anything *work*. The brcms errors still
remain the same.
So the SPROM issue seems to be real, but irrelevant.
I also noticed that the CONFIG_BRCMDBG onyl enables pr_debug(), but
doesn't actually #define DEBUG, so pr_debug() gets compiled out
anyway.
I'll try with -DDEBUG in the brcm80211 subdirectory and see if I get
more interesting output that way.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists