[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1326820502.2478.5.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:15:02 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: WARN if skb_checksum_help() is called on
skb requiring segmentation
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:11 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:43:38PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > skb_checksum_help() has never done anything useful with skbs that
> > require segmentation. Setting skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE makes
> > them invalid and provokes a later WARNing in skb_gso_segment().
> >
> > Passing such an skb to skb_checksum_help() indicates a bug, so we
> > should warn about it immediately. Move the warning from
> > skb_gso_segment() into a shared function, and add the calling function
> > name, gso_type and gso_size to it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> > ---
> > The price for writing the warning format only once is having to pass in
> > the calling function name. Not sure whether it's a good trade-off.
>
> Do we really need the name since we should get a back trace?
If the compiler were to aggressively inline some of these functions then
it might no longer be clear where this was called from. But I agree
that the name is normally redundant, so I'll take it out.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists