[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120119214052.GA12249@hell>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:40:53 +0100
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, equinox@...c24.net,
hans.schillstrom@...csson.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC Hanging clean-up of a namespace
* Eric W. Biederman | 2012-01-19 13:24:13 [-0800]:
>This thread is a fascinating disconnect from reality all of the way
>around.
>
>- inet_twsk_purge already implements throwing out of timewait sockets
> when a network namespaces is being cleaned up. So the RFC is nonsense.
This is how it is implemented, not how it should be. TIME_WAIT is not the
problem, it is there to keep the stack from sending wrong RST messages. Maybe
the 2*MSL could be fixed by a more accurate 2*RTT.
>- Keeping the timewait sockets at that point we purge them in the code
> can achieve nothing. We don't have any userspace processes or network
> devices associated with the timewait sockets at the point we get rid
> of them. The network namespace exists so long as a userspace process
> can find it. The network namespace exit is asynchronous in it's own
> workqueue so userspace definitely is not blocked.
Another possible solution could be a netns global TIME_WAIT list. But this
is a little bit expensive and out of question - but this _is_ a convenient
solution.
The "5 second reboot" is no argument - it show a discrepance between TCP
requirements and the actual situation.
Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists