[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327510327.2425.75.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:52:07 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: sclark46@...thlink.net
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NAT question
Le mercredi 25 janvier 2012 à 10:54 -0500, Stephen Clark a écrit :
> Can iptables do a network to network nat without having to write out a
> bunch of nat rules.
> In other words translate 192.168.198.0/24 to 172.16.10.0/24 without
> having to write out
> 256 rules.
>
> Also can iptables handle 1000 nat rules like above if they have to be
> written out on
> a 1.66ghz intel dual core atom with 1gb of mem.
>
> I know this isn't appropriate question for devel list but I didn't find
> anything googling.
>
> Thanks,
>
If you are forced to use 256 rules, you could split them into 16 tables
of 16 rules and do a hash split.
Since these rules are run only for new connections, it might be OK
performance wise, depending on rate of connection establishment.
If not, you can try NETMAP :)
# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.198.0/24 -j NETMAP --to 172.16.10.0/24
# iptables -t nat -nvL POSTROUTING
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 NETMAP all -- * * 192.168.198.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 172.16.10.0/24
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists