netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/3] sha512: reduce stack usage even on i386

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120127175130.GA742@p183.telecom.by>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:51:30 +0300
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ken@...elabs.ch, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	security@...nel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] sha512: reduce stack usage even on i386

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:35:02PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:02:10PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Fix still excessive stack usage on i386.
> > 
> > There is too much loop unrolling going on, despite W[16] being used,
> > gcc screws up this for some reason. So, don't be smart, use simple code
> > from SHA-512 definition, this keeps code size _and_ stack usage back
> > under control even on i386:
> > 
> > 	-14b:   81 ec 9c 03 00 00       sub    $0x39c,%esp
> > 	+149:   81 ec 64 01 00 00       sub    $0x164,%esp
> > 
> > 	$ size ../sha512_generic-i386-00*
> > 	   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> > 	  15521     712       0   16233    3f69 ../sha512_generic-i386-000.o
> > 	   4225     712       0    4937    1349 ../sha512_generic-i386-001.o
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> 
> Hmm, your patch doesn't apply against my crypto tree.  Please
> regenerate.

I think this is because your tree contained "%16" code instead if "&15".
Now that it contains "&15" it should become applicable.

Anyway.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[PATCH] sha512: reduce stack usage even on i386

Fix still excessive stack usage on i386.

There is too much loop unrolling going on, despite W[16] being used,
gcc screws up this for some reason. So, don't be smart, use simple code
from SHA-512 definition, this keeps code size _and_ stack usage back
under control even on i386:

	-14b:   81 ec 9c 03 00 00       sub    $0x39c,%esp
	+149:   81 ec 64 01 00 00       sub    $0x164,%esp

	$ size ../sha512_generic-i386-00*
	   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
	  15521     712       0   16233    3f69 ../sha512_generic-i386-000.o
	   4225     712       0    4937    1349 ../sha512_generic-i386-001.o

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---

 crypto/sha512_generic.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

--- a/crypto/sha512_generic.c
+++ b/crypto/sha512_generic.c
@@ -100,35 +100,33 @@ sha512_transform(u64 *state, const u8 *input)
 #define SHA512_0_15(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h)			\
 	t1 = h + e1(e) + Ch(e, f, g) + sha512_K[i] + W[i];	\
 	t2 = e0(a) + Maj(a, b, c);				\
-	d += t1;						\
-	h = t1 + t2
+	h = g;							\
+	g = f;							\
+	f = e;							\
+	e = d + t1;						\
+	d = c;							\
+	c = b;							\
+	b = a;							\
+	a = t1 + t2
 
 #define SHA512_16_79(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h)			\
 	BLEND_OP(i, W);						\
-	t1 = h + e1(e) + Ch(e, f, g) + sha512_K[i] + W[(i)&15];	\
+	t1 = h + e1(e) + Ch(e, f, g) + sha512_K[i] + W[i & 15];	\
 	t2 = e0(a) + Maj(a, b, c);				\
-	d += t1;						\
-	h = t1 + t2
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 16; i += 8) {
+	h = g;							\
+	g = f;							\
+	f = e;							\
+	e = d + t1;						\
+	d = c;							\
+	c = b;							\
+	b = a;							\
+	a = t1 + t2
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
 		SHA512_0_15(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h);
-		SHA512_0_15(i + 1, h, a, b, c, d, e, f, g);
-		SHA512_0_15(i + 2, g, h, a, b, c, d, e, f);
-		SHA512_0_15(i + 3, f, g, h, a, b, c, d, e);
-		SHA512_0_15(i + 4, e, f, g, h, a, b, c, d);
-		SHA512_0_15(i + 5, d, e, f, g, h, a, b, c);
-		SHA512_0_15(i + 6, c, d, e, f, g, h, a, b);
-		SHA512_0_15(i + 7, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, a);
 	}
-	for (i = 16; i < 80; i += 8) {
+	for (i = 16; i < 80; i++) {
 		SHA512_16_79(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h);
-		SHA512_16_79(i + 1, h, a, b, c, d, e, f, g);
-		SHA512_16_79(i + 2, g, h, a, b, c, d, e, f);
-		SHA512_16_79(i + 3, f, g, h, a, b, c, d, e);
-		SHA512_16_79(i + 4, e, f, g, h, a, b, c, d);
-		SHA512_16_79(i + 5, d, e, f, g, h, a, b, c);
-		SHA512_16_79(i + 6, c, d, e, f, g, h, a, b);
-		SHA512_16_79(i + 7, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, a);
 	}
 
 	state[0] += a; state[1] += b; state[2] += c; state[3] += d;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html