[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120130212515.GA16261@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:25:15 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
ian.campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V3 16/16] netfront: split event channels
support.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:45:34PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> If this feature is not activated, rx_irq = tx_irq. See corresponding
> netback change log for details.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> index 32ec212..72c0429 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,9 @@ struct netfront_info {
>
> unsigned long rx_gso_checksum_fixup;
>
> - unsigned int evtchn;
> + unsigned int split_evtchn;
bool?
> + unsigned int tx_evtchn, rx_evtchn;
> + unsigned int tx_irq, rx_irq;
> struct xenbus_device *xbdev;
>
> spinlock_t tx_lock;
> @@ -344,7 +346,7 @@ no_skb:
> push:
> RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&np->rx, notify);
> if (notify)
> - notify_remote_via_irq(np->netdev->irq);
> + notify_remote_via_irq(np->rx_irq);
> }
>
> static int xennet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> @@ -577,7 +579,7 @@ static int xennet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>
> RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&np->tx, notify);
> if (notify)
> - notify_remote_via_irq(np->netdev->irq);
> + notify_remote_via_irq(np->tx_irq);
>
> u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
> stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> @@ -1242,22 +1244,35 @@ static int xennet_set_features(struct net_device *dev, u32 features)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static irqreturn_t xennet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +static irqreturn_t xennet_tx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> - struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
> - struct netfront_info *np = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct netfront_info *np = dev_id;
> + struct net_device *dev = np->netdev;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&np->tx_lock, flags);
> + xennet_tx_buf_gc(dev);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>
> - if (likely(netif_carrier_ok(dev))) {
> - xennet_tx_buf_gc(dev);
> - /* Under tx_lock: protects access to rx shared-ring indexes. */
> - if (RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_RESPONSES(&np->rx))
> - napi_schedule(&np->napi);
> - }
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->tx_lock, flags);
> +static irqreturn_t xennet_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct netfront_info *np = dev_id;
> + struct net_device *dev = np->netdev;
> +
> + if (likely(netif_carrier_ok(dev)) &&
> + RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_RESPONSES(&np->rx))
> + napi_schedule(&np->napi);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +static irqreturn_t xennet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + xennet_tx_interrupt(0, dev_id);
> +
> + xennet_rx_interrupt(0, dev_id);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> @@ -1436,9 +1451,14 @@ static void xennet_disconnect_backend(struct netfront_info *info)
> spin_unlock_irq(&info->tx_lock);
> spin_unlock_bh(&info->rx_lock);
>
> - if (info->netdev->irq)
> - unbind_from_irqhandler(info->netdev->irq, info->netdev);
> - info->evtchn = info->netdev->irq = 0;
> + if (info->tx_irq && (info->tx_irq == info->rx_irq))
> + unbind_from_irqhandler(info->tx_irq, info);
> + if (info->tx_irq && (info->tx_irq != info->rx_irq)) {
> + unbind_from_irqhandler(info->tx_irq, info);
> + unbind_from_irqhandler(info->rx_irq, info);
> + }
> + info->tx_evtchn = info->tx_irq = 0;
> + info->rx_evtchn = info->rx_irq = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < info->tx_ring_pages; i++) {
> int ref = info->tx_ring_ref[i];
> @@ -1507,6 +1527,7 @@ static int setup_netfront(struct xenbus_device *dev, struct netfront_info *info)
> int err;
> struct net_device *netdev = info->netdev;
> unsigned int max_tx_ring_page_order, max_rx_ring_page_order;
> + unsigned int split_evtchn;
> int i, j;
>
> for (i = 0; i < XENNET_MAX_RING_PAGES; i++) {
> @@ -1515,7 +1536,6 @@ static int setup_netfront(struct xenbus_device *dev, struct netfront_info *info)
> }
> info->rx.sring = NULL;
> info->tx.sring = NULL;
> - netdev->irq = 0;
>
> err = xen_net_read_mac(dev, netdev->dev_addr);
> if (err) {
> @@ -1524,6 +1544,12 @@ static int setup_netfront(struct xenbus_device *dev, struct netfront_info *info)
> }
>
> err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
> + "split-event-channels", "%u",
We don't want to call them 'feature-split-event-channels' ?
> + &split_evtchn);
> + if (err < 0)
> + split_evtchn = 0;
> +
> + err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
> "max-tx-ring-page-order", "%u",
> &max_tx_ring_page_order);
> if (err < 0) {
> @@ -1589,20 +1615,59 @@ static int setup_netfront(struct xenbus_device *dev, struct netfront_info *info)
> info->rx_ring_ref[j] = err;
> }
>
> - err = xenbus_alloc_evtchn(dev, &info->evtchn);
> - if (err)
> - goto alloc_evtchn_fail;
> + if (!split_evtchn) {
Why not just move most of the code that deals with this
allocation in two seperate functions: setup_netfront_split
and setup_netfront_generic ?
> + err = xenbus_alloc_evtchn(dev, &info->tx_evtchn);
> + if (err)
> + goto alloc_evtchn_fail;
>
> - err = bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler(info->evtchn, xennet_interrupt,
> - 0, netdev->name, netdev);
> - if (err < 0)
> - goto bind_fail;
> - netdev->irq = err;
> + err = bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler(info->tx_evtchn,
> + xennet_interrupt,
> + 0, netdev->name, info);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto bind_fail;
> + info->rx_evtchn = info->tx_evtchn;
> + info->tx_irq = info->rx_irq = err;
> + info->split_evtchn = 0;
> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "single event channel, irq = %d\n",
> + info->tx_irq);
> + } else {
> + err = xenbus_alloc_evtchn(dev, &info->tx_evtchn);
> + if (err)
> + goto alloc_evtchn_fail;
> + err = xenbus_alloc_evtchn(dev, &info->rx_evtchn);
> + if (err) {
> + xenbus_free_evtchn(dev, info->tx_evtchn);
> + goto alloc_evtchn_fail;
> + }
> + err = bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler(info->tx_evtchn,
> + xennet_tx_interrupt,
> + 0, netdev->name, info);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto bind_fail;
> + info->tx_irq = err;
> + err = bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler(info->rx_evtchn,
> + xennet_rx_interrupt,
> + 0, netdev->name, info);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + unbind_from_irqhandler(info->tx_irq, info);
> + goto bind_fail;
> + }
> + info->rx_irq = err;
> + info->split_evtchn = 1;
> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "split event channels,"
> + " tx_irq = %d, rx_irq = %d\n",
> + info->tx_irq, info->rx_irq);
> + }
>
> return 0;
>
> bind_fail:
> - xenbus_free_evtchn(dev, info->evtchn);
> + if (!split_evtchn)
> + xenbus_free_evtchn(dev, info->tx_evtchn);
> + else {
> + xenbus_free_evtchn(dev, info->tx_evtchn);
> + xenbus_free_evtchn(dev, info->rx_evtchn);
> + }
> alloc_evtchn_fail:
> for (; j >= 0; j--) {
> int ref = info->rx_ring_ref[j];
> @@ -1690,11 +1755,27 @@ again:
> }
> }
>
> - err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> - "event-channel", "%u", info->evtchn);
> - if (err) {
> - message = "writing event-channel";
> - goto abort_transaction;
> +
> + if (!info->split_evtchn) {
> + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> + "event-channel", "%u", info->tx_evtchn);
> + if (err) {
> + message = "writing event-channel";
> + goto abort_transaction;
> + }
> + } else {
> + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> + "event-channel-tx", "%u", info->tx_evtchn);
> + if (err) {
> + message = "writing event-channel-tx";
> + goto abort_transaction;
> + }
> + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> + "event-channel-rx", "%u", info->rx_evtchn);
> + if (err) {
> + message = "writing event-channel-rx";
> + goto abort_transaction;
> + }
> }
>
> err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "request-rx-copy", "%u",
> @@ -1808,7 +1889,9 @@ static int xennet_connect(struct net_device *dev)
> * packets.
> */
> netif_carrier_on(np->netdev);
> - notify_remote_via_irq(np->netdev->irq);
> + notify_remote_via_irq(np->tx_irq);
> + if (np->split_evtchn)
> + notify_remote_via_irq(np->rx_irq);
> xennet_tx_buf_gc(dev);
> xennet_alloc_rx_buffers(dev);
>
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists