[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201202070148.06411.tstone@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:48:06 +0100
From: Tim Sander <tstone@...i.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@...i.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"jgq516@...il.com" <jgq516@...il.com>,
"tim.sander@....com" <tim.sander@....com>,
"u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zeng Zhaoming <b32542@...escale.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] net/fec: infinite spin on sirq-net-tx on real-time
Hi
Am Montag 06 Februar 2012, 14:39:59 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> Le lundi 06 février 2012 à 08:25 -0500, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 12:03 +0100, Hector Palacios wrote:
> > > >> @@ -530,6 +531,7 @@ fec_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
> > > >>
> > > >> udelay(10);
> > > >> writel(fep->phy_speed, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_SPEED);
> > > >> writel(FEC_DEFAULT_IMASK, fep->hwp + FEC_IMASK);
> > > >>
> > > >> + fep->link = 0;
> > > >
> > > > Why not call netif_stop_queue(dev) here ?
> > >
> > > I'm no network driver expert so I'll leave it up to others to comment.
> > > I just forward ported a patch I came across in Freescale's BSP which
> > > solves the problem in mainline and in RT.
> >
> > Hector,
> >
> > Eric's suggestion may also work. Could your revert this patch and add
> > the netif_stop_queue(dev) there, and see if it fixes the problems in
> > both mainline and -rt?
>
> Not sure it will be enough to call netif_stop_queue(dev) in fec_stop()
>
> We probably need to start the device with its tx queue stopped, then
> later when device is really ready wakeup the queue.
I am talking about 3.0-rt33 kernel since this is the one i can test the best.
Ok i just found out that removing:
if (!fep->link) {
/* Link is down or autonegotiation is in progress. */
netif_stop_queue(ndev);
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
}
does not seem to work. Also netif_stop_queue seems to be mandantory to get the driver working.
If this condition in the hotpath is removed i see the ksoftirq high cpuload problem again.
I am not sure if the patch for lines 470 if netif_stop_queue(ndev); is really nessary.
I also found an double cleanup in my earlier patch. So heres the next iteration of the
fec ksoftirq fix for preempt rt.
Tim
diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
index 885d8ba..140cb13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/fec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ fec_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
if (!fep->link) {
/* Link is down or autonegotiation is in progress. */
+ netif_stop_queue(ndev);
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
}
@@ -470,6 +471,9 @@ fec_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
udelay(10);
writel(fep->phy_speed, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_SPEED);
writel(FEC_DEFAULT_IMASK, fep->hwp + FEC_IMASK);
+
+ netif_stop_queue(ndev);
+ fep->link = 0;
}
@@ -787,6 +791,7 @@ static void fec_enet_adjust_link(struct net_device *ndev)
if (phy_dev->link) {
if (fep->full_duplex != phy_dev->duplex) {
fec_restart(ndev, phy_dev->duplex);
+ netif_wake_queue(ndev);
status_change = 1;
}
}
@@ -1118,6 +1123,10 @@ static int fec_enet_alloc_buffers(struct net_device *ndev)
bdp = fep->tx_bd_base;
for (i = 0; i < TX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
fep->tx_bounce[i] = kmalloc(FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if(!fep->tx_bounce[i]) {
+ fec_enet_free_buffers(ndev);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
bdp->cbd_sc = 0;
bdp->cbd_bufaddr = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists