[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10120.1328731572@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:06:12 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ML netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: network regression: cannot rename netdev twice
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:57:18 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 07:42, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> > Or is this sort of thing in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:0b:f2:80", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
> > what you are trying to move to, and my systems are already onboard and
> > I should just move along, nothing to see here? ;)
>
> Yeah, that's what we did in the past. It works fine if you never have
> to swap names like eth0 and eth1, with need to free one of the the
> names with a temporary rename.
Well, if I had my druthers, I'd stick name="net-mgt", "net-pub", and "net-10g"
in the udev rules, and not care about 1/2/3 and race conditions, because
meaningful names are easier to not screw up (just last week found a system that
had eth1 and eth2 reversed in some iptables rules, wouldn't have happened if
they were -mgt and -pub).
Only thing stopping me is getting iptables to accept '-i net-10g', and the
distro /etc/sysconfig/network scripts like ifup and ifdown playing nice....
So it sounds like what I want as a sysadmin is the same thing you want
as a maintainer...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists