lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20120209.133413.349832435589531136.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:34:13 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: David.Laight@...LAB.COM Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, bruce.w.allan@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com Subject: Re: [net-next 4/7] e1000e: use true/false for bool autoneg_false From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:15:37 -0000 > >> - if (mac->autoneg_failed == 0) { >> - mac->autoneg_failed = 1; >> + if (mac->autoneg_failed == false) { >> + mac->autoneg_failed = true; > > Don't check for equality with true/false. > Booleans also work better if you avoid double-negatives. Agreed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists