[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120214132755.GA2434@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:27:56 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] netpoll: netpoll_poll_dev() should access dev->flags
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:10:21PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> commit 5a698af53f (bond: service netpoll arp queue on master device)
> use a dubious test : if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE)
>
> It seems to me IFF_SLAVE is present on dev->flags only ?
>
> What am I missing ?
>
I want to say there was a reason for checking priv_flags, but if there was, it
escapes me now. Either way, ->flags is definately what we want now.
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
> index 4ce473e..3d84fb9 100644
> --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void netpoll_poll_dev(struct net_device *dev)
>
> poll_napi(dev);
>
> - if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE) {
> + if (dev->flags & IFF_SLAVE) {
> if (dev->npinfo) {
> struct net_device *bond_dev = dev->master;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists