netdev - Re: [PATCH] b44: fix section mismatch warnings in b44.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120219201332.GF2855@mwanda>
Date:	Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:13:32 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@...hat.com>
Cc:	Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Nikola Pajkovsky <n.pajkovsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44: fix section mismatch warnings in b44.c

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 03:45:54PM +0100, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
> From: Nikola Pajkovsky <n.pajkovsky@...il.com>
> 

This changelog is not really helpful.

Why did you remove an __exit anotation instead changing the callers?
Obviously I looked at the code, so I can answer that question, but I
shouldn't have to.  It should be explained in the changelog.

Sometimes I add in information about when the error message was
introduced.

It might also be nice to mention what the bad effects of this
problem are.

> Signed-off-by: Nikola Pajkovsky <n.pajkovsky@...il.com>
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You're sending the patch from your redhat address; it's best to sign
it with the redhat address as well.

regards,
dan carpenter

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)