lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:01:26 -0800
From:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Shradha Shah <sshah@...arflare.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] macvlan: Disable LRO on lowerdev; warn if it's turned
 back on

On 2/21/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Large Receive Offload (LRO) is only appropriate for packets that are
> destined for the host, and should be disabled if received packets may
> be forwarded.
> 
> Further, macvtap_skb_to_vnet_hdr() will BUG() on a packet received
> with LRO (but not GRO).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> ---
> I'm not really familiar with macvlan so I'm not certain that this should
> be applied to all modes.
> 
> Ben.
> 
>  drivers/net/macvlan.c |    7 +++++++
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 

But this patch assumes the macvlan is forwarding traffic to a guest
via macvtap. Which is an assumption that may not be true.

It seems more appropriate for the macvtap driver to do these checks
after all its the driver that may BUG() with LRO.

Thanks,
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists