[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F43F816.6070908@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:01:26 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Shradha Shah <sshah@...arflare.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] macvlan: Disable LRO on lowerdev; warn if it's turned
back on
On 2/21/2012 11:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Large Receive Offload (LRO) is only appropriate for packets that are
> destined for the host, and should be disabled if received packets may
> be forwarded.
>
> Further, macvtap_skb_to_vnet_hdr() will BUG() on a packet received
> with LRO (but not GRO).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> ---
> I'm not really familiar with macvlan so I'm not certain that this should
> be applied to all modes.
>
> Ben.
>
> drivers/net/macvlan.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
But this patch assumes the macvlan is forwarding traffic to a guest
via macvtap. Which is an assumption that may not be true.
It seems more appropriate for the macvtap driver to do these checks
after all its the driver that may BUG() with LRO.
Thanks,
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists