[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4737E3.3060409@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:10:27 +0800
From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: Fix problem with expired dst cache
于 2012年02月24日 14:47, David Miller 写道:
> From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:20:04 +0800
>
>> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_fib.h b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
>> index b26bb81..3da4d58c 100644
>> --- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
>> +++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
>> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct rt6_info {
>> u32 rt6i_metric;
>> u32 rt6i_peer_genid;
>>
>> + struct rt6_info *rt6i_copy;
>> struct inet6_dev *rt6i_idev;
>> struct inet_peer *rt6i_peer;
>
> This bloats up every route and cached entry in the machine, find
> another way.
Another way is set dst cache's RTF_EXPIRES flag and expires in ip6_rt_copy
and when receive RA packet,update all the related dst cache's expires.
I don't think this is a good idea.
>
>> + if ((rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES) &&
>> + time_after(jiffies, rt->dst.expires))
>
> Poorly formatted, correct way is:
>
> if ((rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES) &&
> time_after(jiffies, rt->dst.expires))
>
>> + if (rt->rt6i_copy && (rt->rt6i_copy->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES) &&
>> + time_after(jiffies, rt->rt6i_copy->dst.expires))
>
> Same problem.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists