netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] bridge: Adjust min age inc for HZ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120305.032410.1729877140582678194.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 05 Mar 2012 03:24:10 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bridge: Adjust min age inc for HZ > 256

From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:14:00 +0100

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote on 2012/03/05 06:09:21:
>>
>> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
>> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:03:50 -0800
>>
>> > I don't understand why this is required.
>>
>> And I don't understand why it takes nearly a week to review a one line
>> patch like this.
>>
>> If you don't say anything I'm going to just apply it after a few days,
>> which is what I did here already.
>>
>> Me applying it should never be your trigger to review the patch, yet I
>> see this happen all the time.  What do you think I was waiting for
>> these past 5 days, divine intervention?
> 
> hmm, does this mean you "unapplied" the patch now?

I can't, it's now in the permanent record so I can't remove it.

At best I can apply a revert patch, but you guys are still discussing
this so I have no idea whether that's even necessary or not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html