[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF88775C78.CE313829-ONC12579B8.003017A8-C12579B8.003053F0@transmode.se>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:47:52 +0100
From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bridge: Adjust min age inc for HZ > 256
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote on 2012/03/05 09:24:10:
>
> From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:14:00 +0100
>
> > David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote on 2012/03/05 06:09:21:
> >>
> >> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:03:50 -0800
> >>
> >> > I don't understand why this is required.
> >>
> >> And I don't understand why it takes nearly a week to review a one line
> >> patch like this.
> >>
> >> If you don't say anything I'm going to just apply it after a few days,
> >> which is what I did here already.
> >>
> >> Me applying it should never be your trigger to review the patch, yet I
> >> see this happen all the time. What do you think I was waiting for
> >> these past 5 days, divine intervention?
> >
> > hmm, does this mean you "unapplied" the patch now?
>
> I can't, it's now in the permanent record so I can't remove it.
>
> At best I can apply a revert patch, but you guys are still discussing
> this so I have no idea whether that's even necessary or not.
OK, hopefully Stephen is happy with my explanation. In any case
I won't be able to retest if only patch 2 is needed as our test window closed
this weekend.
Jocke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists