netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/7] drivers/atm/eni.c: ensure arguments to request_irq and free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201203112058.q2BKwBCS024617@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:58:11 -0400
From:	"Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
To:	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] drivers/atm/eni.c: ensure arguments to request_irq and free_irq are compatible

i am pretty sure that request_irq() shouldnt be changed but rather
free_irq() changed.  the last argument of request_irq() is passed to the
interrupt routine (ent_int in this case).  if you change that you need
to update the interrupt routine.  fixing free_irq would be easier.

In message <1331494587-12196-6-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,Julia Lawall writes:
>Convert call to request_irq so that the last argument is the same as the
>second argument of the subsequent call to free_irq.  Without this
>property, free_irq does nothing.
>
>I have chosen to keep the call to free_irq as is, because its second
>argument is more like its first argument.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html