[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331932962.19406.23.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:22:42 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dept-NX Linux NIC Driver
<Dept_NX_Linux_NIC_Driver@...gic.com>,
Manish Chopra <manish.chopra@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: Added a field fw dump_state
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:10 -0700, Anirban Chakraborty wrote:
>
> On 3/16/12 11:27 AM, "Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 10:58 -0700, Anirban Chakraborty wrote:
> >> +
> >> struct ethtool_dump {
> >> __u32 cmd;
> >> __u32 version;
> >> __u32 flag;
> >> __u32 len;
> >> __u8 data[0];
> >> + __u8 dump_state;
> >
> >Don't be ridiculous.
>
> Yeah I know, especially when there is a flag field already present there.
> The only
> reason, we considered for adding it is to keep the backward compatibility
> of scripts.
> Right now, the flag field sets/gets the dump level of fw. If we use it to
> control the
> dump state, then it would break the existing scripts, if there are any.
>
You missed the point... data[0] must be the last element in the
structure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists