netdev - Re: [PATCH] isdn: Return -EINTR in gigaset_start() if locking attempts fails.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120317.135854.570143927282385505.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	santoshprasadnayak@...il.com
Cc:	hjlipp@....de, tilman@...p.cc, isdn@...ux-pingi.de,
	gigaset307x-common@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isdn: Return -EINTR in gigaset_start() if locking
 attempts fails.

From: santosh prasad nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:26:14 +0530

> Caller is interpreting 0 in opposite way of normal sequence.
> Thats why I misunderstood it.

The simple fact is that you didn't even look at the code at the call
sites when you wrote this patch, and that's the first thing anyone is
going to do when reviewing it.

Therefore your laziness results in more useless work for other people.
I just wanted to point out how selfish and anti-social this kind of
behavior is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html