[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1332106761-18293-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:39:17 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] Gianfar byte queue limits
Identical to v1 but with the additional patch suggested by Eric.
Compile tested. The v1 text follows below the pull request.
Sorry for the near back-to-back sends; I would have liked to have
got this out earlier in the week and not so close to net-next
closing, but that just didn't happen...
Thanks,
Paul
---
The following changes since commit cdf485be3a63d1f34293740fb726088c6840ceea:
ixgbe: dcb: use DCB config values for FCoE traffic class on open (2012-03-14 00:49:10 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git gianfar-bql
for you to fetch changes up to 5407b14c6792d6ff122ecb1a2a6acffad60ef389:
gianfar: use netif_tx_queue_stopped instead of __netif_subqueue_stopped (2012-03-18 17:11:22 -0400)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Gortmaker (4):
gianfar: Add support for byte queue limits.
gianfar: constify giant block of status descriptor strings
gianfar: delete orphaned version strings and dead macros
gianfar: use netif_tx_queue_stopped instead of __netif_subqueue_stopped
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.h | 3 ---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> The BQL support here is unchanged from what I posted earlier as an
> RFC[1] -- with the exception of the fact that I'm now happier with
> the runtime testing vs. the simple "hey it boots" that I'd done
> for the RFC. Plus I added a couple trivial cleanup patches.
>
> For testing, I made a couple spiders homeless by reviving an ancient
> 10baseT hub. I connected an sbc8349 into that, and connected the
> yellowing hub into a GigE 16port, which was also connected to the
> recipient x86 box.
>
> Gianfar saw the interface as follows:
>
> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet: eth0: mac: 00:a0:1e:a0:26:5a
> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet: eth0: Running with NAPI enabled
> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet: eth0: RX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet: eth0: TX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
> PHY: mdio@...24520:19 - Link is Up - 10/Half
>
> With the sbc8349 being diskless, I simply used an scp of /proc/kcore
> to the connected x86 box as a rudimentary Tx heavy workload.
>
> BQL data was collected by changing into the dir:
>
> /sys/devices/e0000000.soc8349/e0024000.ethernet/net/eth0/queues/tx-0/byte_queue_limits
>
> and running the following:
>
> for i in * ; do echo -n $i": " ; cat $i ; done
>
> Running with the defaults, data like below was typical:
>
> hold_time: 1000
> inflight: 4542
> limit: 3456
> limit_max: 1879048192
> limit_min: 0
>
> hold_time: 1000
> inflight: 4542
> limit: 3378
> limit_max: 1879048192
> limit_min: 0
>
> i.e. 2 or 3 MTU sized packets in flight and the limit value lying
> somewhere between those two values.
>
> The interesting thing is that the interactive speed reported by scp
> seemed somewhat erratic, ranging from ~450 to ~700kB/s. (This was
> the only traffic on the old junk - perhaps expected oscillations such
> as those seen in isolated ARED tests?) Average speed for 100M was:
>
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 172.616 s, 607 kB/s
>
> Anyway, back to BQL testing; setting the values as follows:
>
> hold_time: 1000
> inflight: 1514
> limit: 1400
> limit_max: 1400
> limit_min: 1000
>
> had the effect of serializing the interface to a single packet, and
> the crusty old hub seemed much happier with this arrangement, keeping
> a constant speed and achieving the following on a 100MB Tx block:
>
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 112.52 s, 932 kB/s
>
> It might be interesting to know more about why the defaults suffer
> the slowdown, but the hub could possibly be ancient spec violating
> trash. Definitely something that nobody would ever use for anything
> today. (aside from contrived tests like this)
>
> But it did give me an example of where I could see the effects of
> changing the BQL settings, and I'm reasonably confident they are
> working as expected.
>
> Paul.
> ---
>
> [1] http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2012/01/06/64
>
> Paul Gortmaker (3):
> gianfar: Add support for byte queue limits.
> gianfar: constify giant block of status descriptor strings
> gianfar: delete orphaned version strings and dead macros
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.h | 3 ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
--
1.7.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists