[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F69D70B.9090809@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:26:35 +0200
From: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Oren Duer <oren@...lanox.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.co.il>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 6/6] IB/rdma_cm: TOS <=> UP mapping for IBoE
On 03/21/2012 12:03 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 11:25 +0200, Amir Vadai a écrit :
>> From: Amir Vadai<amirv@...lanox.co.il>
>>
>> Both tagged traffic and untagged traffic use tc tool mapping.
>> Treat RDMA TOS same as IP TOS when mapping to SL
>>
>> Since IP TOS to priority mapping is not exported, had to borrow the code from
>> net/ipv4/route.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amir Vadai<amirv@...lanox.co.il>
>> CC: Sean Hefty<sean.hefty@...el.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> We can export IP TOS to priority mapping if the networking maintainers will say
>> where they want it.
>
> Yes please do so. This makes no sense to duplicate ip_tos2prio[]
>
Ok, I will add a patch to export ip_tos2prio, and will use in the code
rt_tos2priority().
- Amir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists