[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120322064101.GD7369@elgon.mountain>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:41:01 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] netlabel: use GFP flags from caller instead of GFP_ATOMIC
This function takes a GFP flags as a parameter, but they are never used.
We don't take a lock in this function so there is no reason to prefer
GFP_ATOMIC over the caller's GFP flags.
There is only one caller, cipso_v4_map_cat_rng_ntoh(), and it passes
GFP_ATOMIC as the GFP flags so this doesn't change how the code works.
It's just a cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
index 2560e7b..7c94aed 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ int netlbl_secattr_catmap_setrng(struct netlbl_lsm_secattr_catmap *catmap,
iter = iter->next;
iter_max_spot = iter->startbit + NETLBL_CATMAP_SIZE;
}
- ret_val = netlbl_secattr_catmap_setbit(iter, spot, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ ret_val = netlbl_secattr_catmap_setbit(iter, spot, flags);
}
return ret_val;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists