lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:01:49 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com>,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
samuel@...tiz.org, lrg@...com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, fabio.estevam@...escale.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] dmaengine: add context parameter fixups
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:18:26PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> But we don't want the clients to use this additional parameter or be
> exposed to it if not required. Every client is expected to use the
> dmaengine wrappers for prepare and not invoke .device_ callbacks.
Are those wrappers present in what's gone to Linus' tree, and can
someone please send a patch to convert to using them?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists