[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQymQaCSKx0aRda6OiP=t2OToxHmvjXjYvTdxsq7oFE3DTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:29:02 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: remove useless update for flag parameter in tcp_enter_frto_loss()
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com> wrote:
>
> It seem that we forget remove below two lines after copying code :)
>
> This update never impacts others.
The 'flag' variable will be used in later iterations of the
tcp_for_write_queue() loop. The comment seems to quite sensibly
indicate that the FLAG_DATA_ACKED bit is being set to avoid entering
that branch of the if statement in later segments in the loop:
2168 if ((tp->frto_counter == 1) && !(flag & FLAG_DATA_ACKED)) {
2169 /* For some reason this R-bit might get cleared? */
2170 if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_RETRANS)
2171 tp->retrans_out += tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
2172 /* ...enter this if branch just for the
first segment */
2173 flag |= FLAG_DATA_ACKED;
2174 } else {
The structure of the logic seems intact from the original commit that
added this:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=d1a54c6a0a3f9c2c4ef71982d89b8571bd9eaa51
neal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists