[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333007887.2325.268.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:58:07 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [Q/RFC] BPF use in broader scope
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 09:44 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I came to an idea of using BPF infrastructure currently used in kernel,
> for computing hashes selecting TX ports in team device. Since the same
> data (skb) are alalyzed/used as for socket filtering, BPF seems so be quite
> suitable for this. It would allow userspace daemon to specify various
> kinds of TX selection algorithms.
>
> Here are proposed things to be done:
> 1) introduce in-kernel api for creating sk-unattached filters (I have
> the patch cooked up already)
>
> 2) extend current BPF machine to allow XOR operation. Not sure if this
> is doable or what the best of doing this is.
>
> 3) add possibility to pass some data to the machine via
> pre-filling "Scratch Memory Store". I think this can be done easily
> moving "u32 mem[BPF_MEMWORDS];" to bpf_func caller and pass it as the
> second function parameter. That should not break anything.
>
> Then the computed hash can be either stored into Scratch memory or returned
> directly (where ordinary sk filters return len).
>
> Does this seems reasonable? Thoughts, comments?
>
Sure it seems good ideas.
Maybe add :
4) be able to extend skb_flow_dissect() using BPF hooks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists