netdev - Re: [Q/RFC] BPF use in broader scope

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1333008145.2325.275.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:02:25 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bhutchings@...arflare.com, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [Q/RFC] BPF use in broader scope

On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 09:54 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:

> Yep, I'm aware. I must admit that the JIT code scares me a litte :(
> 

If you add a new XOR instruction in interpreter only, JIT compiler will
automatically aborts, so no risk.

Each arch maintainer will add the support for the new instructions as
separate patches.

So you can focus on net/core/filter.c file only.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html