lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120329083149.GD2098@minipsycho> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:31:49 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com, shemminger@...tta.com, matt@...abs.org Subject: Re: [Q/RFC] BPF use in broader scope Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:02:25AM CEST, eric.dumazet@...il.com wrote: >On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 09:54 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> Yep, I'm aware. I must admit that the JIT code scares me a litte :( >> > >If you add a new XOR instruction in interpreter only, JIT compiler will >automatically aborts, so no risk. > >Each arch maintainer will add the support for the new instructions as >separate patches. > >So you can focus on net/core/filter.c file only. > Ok - I can do this for 2). But for 3) JITs need to be modified. So I would like to kindly ask you and Matt if you can do this modification so bpf_func takes pointer to mem (scratch store) as second parameter. I'm sure it's very easy for you to do. Ccing Matt. Thanks. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists