[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJFZqHyz_F1bOkx3GnmhhQVUtr+gCJP-fPbPOEb37u7=Lr6EHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:58:56 +0800
From: RongQing Li <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: fix array index in ip6_mc_add_src()
OK, I see, thanks
BR
-Roy
2012/4/3, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
> From: RongQing Li <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:16:14 +0800
>
>> 2012/4/2 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>>> From: roy.qing.li@...il.com
>>> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:45:26 +0800
>>>
>>>> From: RongQing.Li <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> Convert array index from the loop bound to the loop index.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: RongQing.Li <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
>>>
>>> That's not all you are doing:
>>>
>>>> - (void) ip6_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[i]);
>>>> + ip6_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[j]);
>>>
>>> You absolutely MUST mention and explain this (void) removal.
>>> It's probably there to elide an unchecked return value
>>> warning from the compiler.
>>
>> since ip6_mc_del1_src() does not use __must_check likely attribute.
>> I try to compile with several gcc warning options, but do not
>> find which options can report the unchecked return value.
>
> I said "probably", I didn't check myself.
>
> The issue I had was that you didn't mention the void removal in the
> commit message.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists