lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:32:01 +0200
From:	Sasha Levin <>
To:	Julian Anastasov <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has
 been registered

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Julian Anastasov <> wrote:
>        Hello,
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Julian Anastasov <> wrote:
>> >        Ops. It seems now we expose old problem when
>> > no protocol is configured. As this change probably will
>> > go to stable kernels, lets make it correct. Can you
>> > remove the defines around register_ip_vs_proto_netns, so
>> > that it is always compiled. One that wants to save
>> > memory will not disable all protocols. See commit
>> > 091bb34c143674d37a59b2d4857534f7106c5d7d for reference.
>> Oh, so it wasn't getting built right now at all if we didn't select
>> any protocols.
>> How about moving those defines down to our loop as well? this way
>> everything will behave exactly like it did before.
>        Better to remove the defines. It is a misconfiguration
> to enable IPVS without protocols. The referenced commit
> just tried to remove warnings, not save memory by commenting
> unused function. Adding more define makes the things more ugly.

Understood. I'll resend.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists