[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343782.ObcgmM0SbX@alaris>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:58:07 +0200
From: Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Cc: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bonding: start slaves with link down for ARP monitor
On Monday 16 of April 2012 12:27EN, Michal Kubeček wrote:
> On Saturday 14 of April 2012 21:48EN, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > Anybody got a 10 or 100 card laying around with fast autoneg to
> > try? Back in the day I used 3c59x and e100s, and I seem to recall
> > that the 3c59x board I had was pretty speedy at going carrier up.
>
> It seems these cards are hard to find these days (I tried to find one
> in our office but no luck yet). However, I tried an onboard adapter
> with r8169 driver and patched kernel succeeded to detect carrier in
> time for bonding driver to start the slave in "up" state (and it
> started in "down" state with unplugged cable so that the detection is
> correct).
I tested few more cards:
- two 100 Mb/s Realtek 8139C and 8139D with 8139too driver:
driver sets carrier on soon enough and slave starts with "up" and
stays that way (same as r8169)
- 1 Gb/s Intel Pro/1000PT (82572EI) with e1000e driver:
essentially the same as igb, driver is slow and patch prevents the
up -> down -> up sequence by starting the slave in "down" state
- 100 Mb/s Intel (?) cards with DECchip Tulip 21142/3, tulip driver:
card/driver either doesn't set the flag properly or is extremely slow
with up -> down transition so that the state was "up" all the time
no matter what the real link state was
I'll resend v3 with fixed style problem in a moment.
Michal Kubecek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists