lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120423142327.GB32269@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:23:27 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where
 possible

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:17:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> 
> Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when registering an ipvs protocol.
> 
> This is safe since it will always run from a process context.
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

How does this patch meet the Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
requirements?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ