[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120423142327.GB32269@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:23:27 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where
possible
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:17:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
>
> Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when registering an ipvs protocol.
>
> This is safe since it will always run from a process context.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
How does this patch meet the Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
requirements?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists